• I wont buy a touchscreen MacBook Pro heres why you shouldnt eith

    From TechnologyDaily@1337:1/100 to All on Sunday, November 01, 2026 18:15:23
    I wont buy a touchscreen MacBook Pro heres why you shouldnt either

    Date:
    Sun, 01 Nov 2026 18:00:00 +0000

    Description:
    Im unconvinced by Apples MacBook Pro needs a touchscreen, or that Apple can even justify why it exists.

    FULL STORY ======================================================================Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter Earlier this week, Apple did
    the thing weve all known it would for months and finally unveiled its touchscreen MacBook Pro . Awkwardly dubbed the PROLED XDR Display, Apple says the touchscreen panel gives pro users a whole new way to interact with their content.

    Yet, to say Im unconvinced would be an understatement. While Im excited for that OLED goodness, Ive long been skeptical of the benefits of touchscreen laptops, as I find their gesture interactions to be by turns unnecessary and uncomfortable to use for long periods of time. And if something is either so unnecessary that you dont use it or so uncomfortable that it causes your arms to ache, it probably shouldnt be in a product. But hey, what do I know? Practically every Windows laptop manufacturer offers at least one touchscreen version, and now Apple has got in on the act. Im sure Apple will do what it often does and blow everyone else away with a perfected feature that
    redefines what a touchscreen display should be about right? Latest Videos From TechRadar Watch full video here:

    Actually, scratch that, Im still totally unconvinced. Because not only has Apple completely sidestepped the entire issue of arm fatigue, but it seems
    the company cant even convincingly explain why anyone should buy a
    touchscreen MacBook in the first place (and lets not even talk about the $2,899 starting price or the $14,549 maximum configuration ). No, I think Ill be sitting this one out. Heres why you might also want to. Simply the best? (Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future) If we want to understand why this touchscreen MacBook Pro exists and maybe why you should buy one we should look at how Apple frames it . The company says that Graphic designers can now use the entire display as their canvas, no longer constrained by the area of the trackpad when drawing, and that musicians can play software instruments right onscreen. You may like Oops! Apple just put its first laptop
    touchscreen on the wrong MacBook Apple event live the MacBook Pro with PROLED XDR Display is here 'It doesn't work': Steve Jobs on why there was never a touchscreen MacBook and why I think he'd totally love what's coming next

    But does Apple actually think that doing either of those things is going to
    be remotely comfortable for more than about 10 seconds? Theres a reason why people play keyboards horizontally, after all: because playing an entire gig with your arms held rigid and outstretched is a quick path to aching limbs. Why would it be any different on a laptop?

    Surely Apple doesnt picture long-term usage like that, so my guess is it expects youll do a few quick taps on-screen and then go back to a normal,
    sane way of using your laptop. But if you only interact with the touchscreen for a few seconds at a time, is it really worth it? Is that kind of limited interaction good value for money when youre paying a $400 premium over the regular MacBook Pro? Get daily insight, inspiration and deals in your inbox Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
    Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from
    us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

    Maybe, maybe not, but the fact that Apples big, expensive, flagship feature
    is something many people will simply shrug their shoulders at suggests a failure of inspiration on Apples part.

    Yes, you get a beautiful OLED panel as well for your $400, and that I think
    is easily justified. But every feature in a product you buy should be able to justify its existence, especially in an Apple product and especially in these expensive times. Yet the touchscreen panel just feels like its come along for the ride.

    After all, Apple is the company that has reinvented category after category, from portable music players to smartphones to tablets and beyond. And now the best it can do is a feature that isnt comfortable to use for long periods and that is best employed in short bursts with extended periods of inactivity in between. What to read next Apple's Touchscreen MacBook Pro is finally here, and yes, touching a MacBook screen feels totally and wonderfully natural
    Quote of the day by Apple co-founder Steve Jobs on touchscreens: "After an extended period of time, your arm wants to fall off" What's the tech inside the touchscreen MacBook Pro's 'PROLED XDR' screen? We explain all

    If Apple, of all companies, cant blow you away with a feature that resets expectations of how the category should work, why is it bothering at all? Apples mantra has long been not to be first, but to be best. Does this touchscreen really feel like the best in the industry, or just another addition to the pile? An uninspired feature (Image credit: Apple) In hands-on demos across the land, plenty of people have said that using the touchscreen MacBook Pro feels great or totally and wonderfully natural, in the words of my colleague Lance Ulanoff and I dont doubt that it does.

    But that doesnt negate Steve Jobs criticisms of the idea of touchscreen laptops at all. In his famous critique, Jobs said that after a short period
    of time you start to fatigue, and after an extended period of time your arm wants to fall off.

    Im sure that Apple has crafted its touchscreen display in such a way that it does indeed feel amazing when you first start using it. A few taps and swipes and youre probably ready to part with your cash.

    The problem is that, unless Ive missed something, our arms havent evolved in the 16 years since Jobs made that oft-cited pronouncement. Keep using a touchscreen laptop, whether its made by Apple or anyone else, and you will eventually start to feel fatigue and pain.

    Given the laws of biology havent changed, I was hoping that Apple at least
    had some sort of killer feature up its sleeve for the touchscreen display. Sadly, Ive come away disappointed.

    Even John Ternus, Apples new CEO, cant seem to sell it well. When asked by Wired why Apple decided to release a touchscreen MacBook, Ternus had this to say:

    We needed to get to a point where adding touch didnt make the product lesser in any way. It didnt make it heavier. It didnt make it thicker. That came together with the OLED screen, the best display weve ever put into a Mac. All of these things, and, oh yeah, it has touch as well.

    Oh yeah, it has touch as well.

    It feels like that sums up the inclusion of the touchscreen almost too well. Why did Apple include it in the MacBook Pro? Yeah, I guess we may as well do it. Thats the way it sounds to me.

    Is that the attitude of a company that leads? Of one that prides itself on inspiration and innovation? Or just one that sees everyone else doing touchscreen laptops and thinks it should probably tag along? (Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future) Look again at what Ternus said. The time was right to include a touchscreen because Apple could do so without making the MacBook
    Pro worse. Not the time was right because including a touchscreen would elevate the MacBook Pro to exciting new heights. Just, hey, whats the worst that could happen?

    Apples playbook has often been to let others go first and wait until it has the capability to blow everyone else away, not to let others go first and
    then add their own thing because I suppose the time is right. It just screams of passive, unimaginative thinking. Wheres the drive, the passion? The desire to make something insanely great?

    Are we really expected to believe that Steve Jobs made the first iPhone a touchscreen product because he wanted the companys customers to say oh yeah, it has multi-touch as well? That designing an Apple device was a checkbox exercise of adding what you could as long as it didnt make the experience crap? Jobs was famous for his conniptions, and you can bet everything youve got hed have one if thats how his teams thought.

    And yet here we are, with Apples own CEO making the headline feature of his latest MacBook Pro feel like an afterthought that half of the companys users might not even notice. It boggles the mind.

    Before the PROLED MacBook Pro launched, my colleague Lance Ulanoff pointed
    out that Steve Jobs often changed his opinions and argued that Jobs would
    have loved the idea of a touchscreen MacBook Pro . Maybe so, but he would
    have hated the milquetoast way that Apple has framed it. Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. The best MacBooks and Macs for all budgets Our top picks, based on real-world testing and comparisons

    Read our full guide to the best MacBooks and Macs 1. Best MacBook overall: MacBook Air 13-inch M5 2. Best budget MacBook: MacBook Neo 3. Best Mac: Mac mini (M4) 4. Best MacBook Pro MacBook Pro 14-inch M5 5. Best Mac for professionals Mac Studio M4 Max



    ======================================================================
    Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/computing/macbooks/apples-touchscreen-macbook-pro-ha s-left-me-utterly-unconvinced-and-i-believe-steve-jobs-would-hate-the-uninspir ed-thinking-that-got-us-here


    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)