Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says people think governments are using AI to
screw them over, and thats why the tech is having a a crisis of trust and
hes exactly right

Date:
Wed, 26 Aug 2026 20:10:00 +0000

Description:
AI is having a 'crisis of trust' because it can't be trusted

FULL STORY ======================================================================Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter A lot has already been said about the doom and gloom surrounding AI - some of it drawing on the warnings of classic dystopian novels, but much of it grounded in reality. There is a lot of optimism and promises from those in control of the technology, but not much has emerged in the form of actual benefit.

I think by far the most accurate criticism of AI companies including
Anthropic is that we havent yet delivered on our big promises to benefit the world, Anthropic CEO and co-founder Dario Amodei has said in a post on X .
The technology is suffering from a crisis of trust that stems from peoples belief that companies and governments are cooking up some new way to screw them over, he argues. But given how much of the US military, law enforcement, and intelligence gathering infrastructure now relies on AI, are the people wrong? Latest Videos From TechRadar Watch full video here: AI cant public relations its way out of this one As AI technology took off, much of the benefit of the technology was aimed at convincing executives and C-suites
that the technology - while unproven - was a worthwhile investment. As a result, multiple AI leaders positioned the technology as a way to strip away the labor costs of companies by replacing workers with AI.

Some AI gurus are still arguing these points behind closed doors. I attended
a private event this year where an AI "guru" predicted that AI superintelligence would erase as much as 50% of the global workforce within
10 years, and the companies best positioned to take advantage of this cataclysmic event would reap unimaginable control and riches. This was naturally met by applause from the upper echelons of management from
companies in attendance. You may like Its hard to feel sorry for AI companies when China is giving them a taste of their own medicine Googles AI chief
warns of growing AGI risks The more famous people tell me to use AI, the less I want to

Amodei himself famously said that AI could wipe out 50% of white collar jobs. But he has since restructured this message, saying instead that AI is a multiplier of output - or corporate word salad for increasing productivity without having to increase compensation.

As I have said numerous times, the proof of AI really is in the pudding. Weve heard everything that it could do, but seen little benefit in what it can do. To his point, Amodei acknowledges that. Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed! Contact me
with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

He notes that if an advert went up saying that AI could cure cancer, it would be perceived as entirely misleading. The thing that will work is actually curing cancer , he says.

Amodei has teased Anthropics morality on these issues, saying that the
company is ramping up its efforts to focus on using AI for biology and medicine. But again, were yet to see the results.

Amodeis post also touched on where AI is centralizing power, echoing some of Mark Zuckerbergs recent rant on how best to use AI for everyones benefit. Amodeis argument differed slightly from Zuckerbergs, arguing that there is a balance to be struck between regulation, oversight, testing, and open-weight models. What to read next Why Anthropics closed approach may be safer than OpenAIs Young people increasingly don't trust AI - or the billionaires that keep telling us we should all love AI, survey finds Many companies are struggling to fully trust AI at work

He notes that in some aspects he agrees with the Pacing the Frontier movement , stating that implementing controls on the frontier labs would modulate the pace of the technology while simultaneously allowing the rest of the industry to catch up.

The obvious flaw in this plan is that no other nation would be subject to
this regulation which could deliberately hamstring US hegemony in the AI industry - something the Trump administration has frequently said it will not allow to happen. Is AI delivering more benefits to authoritarian infrastructure than to people? Where AI systems have been deployed
extensively is in surveillance infrastructure. Until the collapse of its relationship with the Pentagon, Anthropic was working with the Department of Defense to procure AI systems. Anthropic refused to cooperate in allowing its technology to be used for mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons, and lost the contract.

Luckily for the DoD, OpenAI shook hands on a new deal with the Pentagon and immediately filled the shoes left by Anthropic with a prohibition on its technology being used to spy on Americans.

That doesnt mean other companies are abiding by the same level of ethics. Flock has faced a widespread guerrilla movement targeting its AI-powered cameras designed to track vehicle number plates across the US.

The system is intended to flag suspects cars as they travel across boundaries and lines of authority, but has instead seen success as a way for members of law enforcement to stalk exes , monitor colleagues, and track their love interests.

AI systems are also being deployed in traffic monitoring and speeding
cameras. This in particular has received a lot of attention as a grey area of policing, especially for systems that misidentify numberplates or are wrongly configured.

For criminal cases in the US, the burden of proof rests with the government
to prove someone committed a crime. However, some autonomous ticketing
systems that have issued citations to the wrong vehicles have been criticized for requiring those accused to prove their innocence in court, flipping the burden of proof for criminal cases on its head.

And then there is the elephant in the room.

Palantirs AI technology is deployed across the US military and law enforcement. Most notably, it has been used by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to track those suspected of illegal immigration - but Palantirs technology is also used in drone imagery analysis, long-range precision strikes, and military data analysis and planning.

No doubt it has been instrumental in delivering the World Record for the most times a single war has been won.

AI is great news if you have nothing to hide and love being on the side of
the Good Guys, but that's a constantly shifting definition. Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.



======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/pro/anthropic-ceo-dario-amodei-says-people-think-gov ernments-are-using-ai-to-screw-them-over-and-thats-why-the-tech-is-having-a-a- crisis-of-trust-and-hes-exactly-right


--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 (Linux/64)
* Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)