Britain is building its tech empire on sand

Date:
Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:41:53 +0000

Description:
Britains tech ambitions falter as developer burnout stifles innovation.

FULL STORY ======================================================================Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Tech Radar Pro Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed! Contact me with news
and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over. You are now subscribed Your newsletter sign-up was successful An account already exists for this email address, please log in. Subscribe to our newsletter Wed love
to call the UK a global leader in AI, fintech, and digital innovation. But
the truth is: were straining the very engineers we need to deliver on that ambition.

Instead of enabling our technical talent to innovate, too many organizations are exhausting them with firefighting and patching work. A staggering 66% of UK developers say they now spend more time maintaining code than building anything new. Another 81% say theyre simply too stretched to make space for creative or innovative work. Article continues below You may like Europes innovation strategy is failing. Heres how to fix it Digital friction is quietly crippling UK productivity, and AI could be the turning point Entering the post-speed era: when everyone can ship fast, control becomes the real advantage Tom Finch Social Links Navigation

Technical Engineering Lead EMEA at Chainguard. What we're asking of engineers right now is the equivalent of asking Formula 1 drivers to build their own cars mid-race, and then blaming them when they lose.

You don't need to be an engineer to understand the implications. Its time to talk about the productivity tax on engineers Whether we admit it or not, weve normalized a working culture where developers are constantly stuck in
reactive mode: battling backlogs, triaging vulnerabilities, or trying to unravel legacy spaghetti code. These are problems they didnt create, yet are somehow responsible for fixing.

Unsurprisingly, developer burnout is spiking. More than one-third (35%) of engineers say burnout is the top barrier to a positive work experience, while two-thirds of engineering leaders now worry about retaining talent under
these conditions. Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed! Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners
or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms &
Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

Whats worse, all this toil comes at the cost of innovation. Now, engineers only spend 16% of their time actually building new features, even though 93% say its the most energizing part of their role.

Every time a new CVE drops, or another vendor announces a zero-day cybersecurity exploit, its developers who get pulled away from meaningful product work to patch problems. This isnt a niche frustration; its a widespread failure of process.

If we want to build business apps secure by default, we need to shift the burden away from individual engineers and embed security earlier in the development lifecycle. That means less reactive patching and more secure-by-design tooling. What to read next The key to the UK's AI success lies in closing the skills gap The death of the IT department, as we know it How CIOs can shift from patch and pray to risk-based software change

Engineers dont want another tool. They want time back. The balance between risk and innovation Open source now underpins 90% of all software, and while it has allowed organizations to move and innovate quickly, it has also introduced risk in the software supply chain: Code from unknown maintainers, unverified binaries, and no provenance.

The UKs new Software Security Code of Practice is a welcome first step it calls for secure software development and open source governance. But it doesnt yet tackle the root problem: were fueling innovation with untrusted code, and developers are the ones left firefighting.

If the UK wants to lead on AI, it needs to stop treating software supply
chain security as a patch management job. Make security a developer-first concern.

Start with minimal, trusted base images, signed SBOMs, and hardened
components from the first line of code not as an afterthought at deploy
time.

Give developers default access to signed packages, vulnerability-free base images, and verified libraries as part of their everyday toolchain.

Organizations like Snowflake are already embedding hardened images, secure defaults, and automated build tooling into their developer workflows.

The UK cant win the tech race without its builders. Want to compete in the AI era? Start by giving your engineers the space to engineer. Check our list of the best no-code platforms.



======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/pro/britain-is-building-its-tech-empire-on-sand


--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 (Linux/64)
* Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)