Wow, had not heard of this one either. VERY interesting - I'm going to
be checking this out too.
Thanks to Hollowone for mentioning it!
Arelor wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: FreeDOS vs MS-DOS
By: Gamgee to Jimmy Anderson on Sun May 04 2025 08:42 am
Wow, had not heard of this one either. VERY interesting - I'm going to
be checking this out too.
Thanks to Hollowone for mentioning it!
I tested it for an article that I recently published.
In my opinion, if you just want to run some DOS or even Windows 95 application, DOSbox-X is probably the easiest way.
PCem and its fork 86box are targetted at emulation precision, which
means they take a good bunch of resources to run in comparison. Also, since they are designed to emulate a number of devices, they are harder
to setup. These are the options to pick if you need to replicate a specific environment... otherwise they are a bit overkill.
| Sysop: | smooth0401 |
|---|---|
| Location: | New Providence, NJ |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 47:07:56 |
| Calls: | 333 |
| Files: | 673 |
| D/L today: |
61 files (9,462K bytes) |
| Messages: | 56,581 |